Then there's the following Example..
This is from the Entertainment section of the LA Times. Even though we're a finance-economics blog, this example of piss-poor journalism written in a well known newspaper like the Times was too good (or terrible) to pass up...
From The LA Times:
'Hatfields and McCoys' brings out Kevin Costner haters
Kevin Costner rode again in "The Hatfields and the McCoys" on Sunday night, with his haters in hot pursuit.
Taking its first shot at scripted drama, History begin airing its three-part epic miniseries about the notorious late 19th century feud between warring Appalachian clans, with the former "Dances With Wolves" star-director as patriarch Anse Hatfield and Bill Paxton as his rival, Randall McCoy.
Reviews were mixed, but Costner's detractors... were out in full force Sunday.
"I cannot remember if I hate Kevin Costner because he is a Hatfield or McCoy or if it's just because he is Kevin Costner," tweeted @mar*****se.
"This reality show on The History Channel is great. I didn't realize that Bill Paxton and Kevin Costner hated each other," @ste****iri added wryly.
As @jul***ey44 summed up: "Part 1 of "Hatfields & McCoys" was pretty good ... seems like Kevin Costner and Bill Paxton will be locks for Emmy nominations.""
WTF?!! Are you Kidding? Quoting from Twitter comments????
Next, we'll put aside the fact that the topic of the pseudo-article was utterly stupid since we're all Kevin Costner Fans and Admirers here at A&G ..
But really, is this garbage worthy of a major newspaper? This is the LA Times, not some newspaper of a town with the population of 500.
Some lazy Bleep writer searching through Tweeter feeds while in his bedtime jammies to gauge response to a TV show and actor...and got paid for it! Rrrr
Its trivial because its just a TV mini-series but this is the future of newspaper writing folks, and its quite sickening a spectacle.
No comments:
Post a Comment