"I'm not concerned about the very poor"

Republican candidate Mitt Romney is honest.

I don't mean its really as a positive- its just the truth...

"I'm not concerned about the very poor."

As truthful and sincere a comment as a politician of either party could ever make short of someone saying 'I care nothing of the voters once I win election'

 He doesn't care.  Obama doesn't care either.  Its just the President is smart or savvy enough to never say it outright.  But its true.  He doesn't.  No politician does, because you probably could count on two hands the number of Presidents, Senators, Governors or Congresspeople in the last 30years who grew up in dire poverty and difficult circumstance, and yet made it where they are today.  

Now the full Romney quote was this:  

"I'm not concerned about the very poor.  We have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I'll fix it. I'm not concerned about the very rich. They're doing just fine. I'm concerned about the very heart of America, the 90-95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling." (AP)

That's so very clever... let's break it down sentence by sentence...

The first sentence we talked about-- Romney doesn't care for the very poor.  Absolutely true.  He really doesn't care about the moderately poor or minimum wage class person either.  But then, in all honesty, who does, right?  Unless you are poor yourself, or remember what it was like to be under the poverty line.  The lower middle class?  Ehh.. not really.. Statistically, they don't really donate much to political campaigns and when so, its heavily Democrat.  So Romney wouldn't care about them either.

Next sentence- referencing the safety net.  Not sure what 'net' he speaks of?  Does he mean food stamps which allow you to buy shit like chocolate cookies and Cheetoes but can't use it to buy warm meals from supermarket like a rotisserie chicken?  Does Romney mean welfare which is just barely enough to get by, and which JP Morgan Chase profits in the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars annually by having exclusive rights to print out the welfare cards?  Or maybe social security, which is being gutted by a diminished worker pool and dirty politician tricks like payroll tax rebates so workers can keep an extra $20/wk while diminishing Social Security by at least $24 billion in 2011 alone?

Next sentence- fixing the safety net.  Romney may be honest but he's not trustworthy.  Do I really expect the party that calls such safety nets "entitlements" derisively and who would love to roll back the clock to pre-1930s Depression when it comes to such safeguards to 'fix it'?!

Next 2 sentences- Romney says he doesn't care about the rich- they can take care of themselves.  Does anyone really believe that?  Is Goldman Sachs Romney's #1 corporate donor because they don't want to be taken care of?  (Goldman is also Obama's #1 donor so tells you all you need to know this upcoming election)  Are wealthy people writing checks to Romney's campaign so their needs will be ignored and dismissed?  Get real!

Last sentence:  Romney is concerned about the 'heart of America'. Awww..  that's very sweet of him.  He calls those people the 90-95% of Americans.  That's a very clever way to twist the 99% vs 1% Occupy movement argument.  So let's see.. based on that percentage, the super wealthy are still 1% so that means the very poor only represent at best 4-9% of the nation.  Sorry Mittens, your math is skewed.  

It is a statistical Fact that 1 in 6 Americans are getting food stamps.   That means around 17% of the population.  Then when you add in all the Americans on welfare and Social Security due to age or disability, you're looking at over 1 in 4 Americans in need of Federal handout from the government to survive.   That's over 25%  And most sure ain't middle-class.

So really, if Romney was as honest with his percentages as he was with his non-compassion for the poor, he's concerned about 50.1%.  Specifically the 50.1% of American voters who will get Romney elected by embracing corporate tax breaks, lower taxes for wealthy, trickle-down economic policies and admire that Romney made his fortune as a ruthless Wall St. capitalist  rather than a creator of real products or services.

~  This posting should in No Way imply or assume an endorsement for President Obama for reelection.   No, no, no, no.... At this moment, if choosing between Romney and Obama in a general election, yours truly would rather simply stay home and not vote.

Ox bladder does Not taste like Chicken

Wild posting header I know... trust me, it all fits in by the end of the reading...

Another frustrating market day.. here we go..

Market is up about 130pts as of 2:38p

OK, fine.. why?

"Wednesday's gains were pushed by strong manufacturing data and positive signals from Greece. U.S. factories boosted output in January by the most in seven months, according to the Institute for Supply Management's manufacturing index. And the Commerce Department said construction spending rose 1.5 percent in December for the fifth consecutive monthly gain. "This is a market that is hungry for good news, and when it gets it, it responds very positively," said Alan Gayle, senior investment strategist for RidgeWorth Investments."  (AP)


Oh Jeebus Crispus!!~  What a load of...  Hmm.. Where to begin:

~ Bougatsa- a Greek pastry & breakfast treat


1)  For those who didn't look at yesterday's blog posting, Greek debt talks have dramatically taken a turn for the worse with the Greek govt calling an emergency meeting on Thursday to discuss what to do.  Banks don't want to take any real losses (negotiated credit markdowns thus far have been covered by insurance so banks and investors don't take any real hit)   They want Greece to cut pensions and lower the minimum wage, something Greek politicians know if they do, will be political suicide at minimum and anarchy & overthrow at worst.   


Of course for some inexplicable reason, Greece still feels the need to calm and soothe markets so a government spokesman released an empty statement that negotiations will conclude within days. 


And this empty piece of (fill in cuss word) statement raised hopes!  


I guess Rat investors are much like horny teenage boys-- it doesn't take much effort to raise their um.. hopes.  

2)  People read headlines and take positives on face value.  I mean who wants to dispute anything 'good' if it keeps the ruse of a growing economy going and Wall St profits growing?   Sooo.. the market also is up today because "construction spending rose 1.5 percent in December for the fifth consecutive monthly gain".  That figure, called PMI (Purchasing Managers' Index) which is an indicator of the economic health of the manufacturing sector, was at 54.1 for January.  December 2011's PMI was 53.1  So.. Yay!!!  


Oh, but wait-- what was PMI last year, say February 2011?  It was 59.8.  And what was it in March and April?  It was 59.7.    In fact here's the chart for the past 12 months.



Jan 2012 54.1   Jul 2011  51.4
Dec 2011 53.1   Jun 2011 55.8
Nov 2011 52.2 May 2011 54.2
Oct 2011  51.8   Apr 2011 59.7
Sep 2011 52.5 Mar 2011 59.7
Aug 2011 52.5       Feb 2011 59.8


I guess an eternal optimist can say January's figures are the best in seven months and this means things are Really getting better.   And a person in the world of reality can say seven months later, and the manufacturing sector's production still hasn't matched last July.  We know which choice the (fill in your most vile cussword) Investors made.   How about you?

3)  I thought the quote at the end of the AP story was interesting and telling.. I will repeat it:  "This is a market that is hungry for good news, and when it gets it, it responds very positively,"   


Hmm... Hungry for good news... Hungry for pretend good news... Hungry for Anything to justify the market rally.    Reminds me of of the TV show "Fear Factor"- there's a part of the show where contestants have to eat something truly disgusting and vile, like ox bladder, tarantula or elephant penis and if they don't, they can't continue with the competition.    


Usually there's three kinds of contestants:  the first are normally brave and courageous-- the type to skydive or climb mountains, but when it comes to the grotesque, they have too much dignity and common sense to ingest something putrid into their healthy bodies and pretend its 'food'.    The second type are similar to the first, but they psych themselves-- convince themselves that everything in the world ultimately tastes like chicken, and engorges on the inedible nastiness.


Then there's the third type- they're hungry.  Hungry not necessarily to eat but hungry for money... hungry to win... to be better than everyone else and nothing is off the table in that pursuit.  So they will eat the horribleness; they will devour and overtly go 'Mmmmm' to try to convince everyone else the rot their eating is something delicious because to this kind of person, there is no such thing as inedible or indigestible-- everything is an eating opportunity; a means to profit and win.


Guess which type Investors are?