We will call today's posting 'Isn't it funny..' even though very little of what we will discuss is humorous or amusing, but it allows us to cover an array of different mini-topics...
~ Isn't it funny how proud we are as a nation are at Dow 15,000 as if its some patriotic act? Certainly we know why the rats and roaches who Invest are pleased as punch, but the nation as a whole?
Are they that out of touch with reality? Do they really attach national pride to wealthy people making More wealth??
Used to be a strong Dow meant a strong national economy. Now its actually the opposite. For instance in England, On May 5, 2008 their stock market, the FTSE closed at 6,204.
Five years later, their economy is an utter mess; so bad they, unlike in the US, actually Admit they're back in recession... Their unemployment rate is 7.9% and in a population of 63 million, 2.56 mil are out of work..
So how's their stock market doing today?
Closed at 6,521 -- the market is 317 pts Higher today with a dreadful economic situation than it was 5 years ago today when things were much rosier.
Why? Because whoever runs their finances are big believers in QE as well.
Another example-- Japan. They've been economic purgatory for the last couple decades but five years ago, on May 5th 2008 their market called NIKKEI 225 closed at 13,655.
In October 2008 it dropped to a low of 7659 and after a lot of up and down, it finished the week of November 7th, 2012 at 8757.
And now, in a mere six months... 180 days, their market has artificially climbed up to a close today at 13,694.. That's a jump of 4,937pts in less time does it take to conceive a child.
And pray tell, what was the secret of their 'success'?
Lots of QE and Heavy and we mean HEAVY devaluation of their currency, the Yen which makes it very attractive for foreign businesses and investors but kills the Japanese consumer, much like what the Fed does hurts Americans.
So what was once a barometer of the strength and economic vitality of a nation is now the opposite-- the stronger the market tallies, the more fucked up those nations are financially and the worse off for the bottom 99% of those populaces.
~ Isn't it funny how easy as pie it is to apply for and receive loans to attend college?
All one has to be is 18 years old an have a pulse.
You can major in anything you want- Philosophy, Religious Studies, Ancient Languages... The loaner doesn't care-- its not even a prerequisite that you put down a major that may give you a fighting chance at a job one day.
Then again we suppose, why should it?
If its not a prerequisite that the applicant for financial aid have a job, have any property or collateral or even have any savings, then it would be silly for the government, who backs the loans to inquire how you will ever pay them back while taking on degrees in worthlessness...
And yet, try getting a loan for an automobile... Try applying for a credit card.. 'What is your annual salary?' 'Do you own or rent your home?' 'What is your credit score?'
Wonder why this is?
Certainly we all know that loans for homes, cars, credit cards and such can be removed in a bankruptcy while student loan debt is with you until you pay in full with interest or your last breath is extinguished, in which case, the government goes into your estate and takes what's needed to pay that debt before your kin get a penny...
But why is everyone steered to getting a college education?
Mainly because going to college delays filing for unemployment. This is precisely why the GI Bill was enacted back in 1944.
Prior to WWII, in 1940 the unemployment rate in the US was 14.9% 1941 it was 9.9%. By 1944, it dropped to 1.2%. Eventually these servicemen were going to come home and needed jobs, which were not always easy to come by...
So by providing all this assistance, GIs were able to delay re-entry into the work force by 2-4 years, allowing the government time to adjust from a war to peacetime economy.
The situation with today's young adults are a little different in that unlike GIs who had the education provided for them, it is the student and that heavy debt load who are supposed to piggy-back the floundering economy
For the first time in history, US student loan debt surpassed one Trillion. And that hasn't phased parents one bit from pressuring their kids to take on that debt.
And most young people are more than happy to have an additional 4-6 years to avoid being adults while spending four years drinking, drugging, partying and unsafely sexually experimenting...
They just assume magically a job will be there at the end and forget student loans are only the first of a lifetime of debts accrued.
~ Lastly, isn't it funny how people believe stats without taking any time to delve into them on their own?
Let's take last Friday's announcement by the Bureau of Labor Statistics that 165k new jobs were created in April-- Horray~ We'll put aside the fact that 250k new jobs must be created at minimum to keep up with population growth...
How do the jobs break down? (All stats come from the BLS report)
* Professional and business services added 73,000 jobs. Of that figure, temporary help services were (+31,000), professional and technical services (+23,000), and management of companies (+7,000).
73k averages to 1,460 new jobs per state. 42% of those jobs are worthless Temps with no rights who can be fired at any time for any or no reason... Less than 10% were managers i.e. those with higher education who expect higher salary.
* Within leisure and hospitality, employment in food services and drinking places rose by 38,000 over the month.
This averages to 760 new servers, etc per state...
These are where many college graduates and those still in school are turning to make ends meet. Turnover rates are usually 50% so often these new 'hires' are those who may have quit other leisure or food services jobs a month or two prior.
Thus, its not 'new' labor.
Also, because servers and bartenders in particular are heavily dependent on tips, its no skin off owners' noses to hire them en masse.
* Retail trade employment increased by 29,000 in April. Job growth occurred in general merchandise stores (+15,000) and in health and personal care stores (+5,000).
That averages to 580 jobs per state... These 'professions' usually pay around $9-11/hr. That's $18,720 to $22,880/yr Before taxes
* Health care added 19,000 jobs in April. Within the industry, employment rose in ambulatory health care services (+14,000). Employment also continued its upward trend in social assistance.
That averages to 380 jobs per state. So if you have actual licensed medical knowledge or training, its still a rough go. But if you can drive an ambulance or assist the elderly i.e. wipe their bottoms and drive them to Dr appointments, there's work for you.
* Employment changed little over the month in construction, with small offsetting movements in the residential and nonresidential components.
Employment in other major industries, including mining and logging, wholesale trade, transportation and warehousing, financial activities, and government, showed little change over the month.
In other words, stagnant to no job growth.
Wall Street cheered over this report...
If you cheered along with them, pardon us, but you're clueless.
Showing posts with label BLS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BLS. Show all posts
Monday, May 6, 2013
Friday, February 3, 2012
The Statistical Distortion Game Never Ends
When I checked the news this morning and saw unemployment dropped dramatically from 9.2% to 8.3% in one month, I was furious! Don't get me wrong-- it wasn't because people were getting hired.
It was more because people really weren't.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics stated that non-farm payrolls went up by 243k in January, meaning in simple terms that 243,000 people were newly hired. Now, with rising population and those newly entering the work force taken into consideration, it takes a monthly creation of 225k jobs to lower unemployment... Mind you, this is over time, as in many years.
So how did the unemployment rate drop sooo dramatically??
1.2 million people dropped out of the labor force in one month!
Yes -- 1.2 million people.
"The labor force increased from 153.9 million to 154.4 million, the non institutional population increased by 242.3 million meaning, those not in the labor force surged from 86.7 million to 87.9 million. Which means that the civilian labor force tumbled to a fresh 30 year low of 63.7% as the BLS is seriously planning on eliminating nearly half of the available labor pool from the unemployment calculation... the US is replacing high paying FIRE jobs with low paying construction and manufacturing... " (ZeroHedge)
So what is the real uemployment rate in the US based on statistics from the BLS?
11.5% unemployed.
Its all about math (Warning- this gets a little technical):
"Using BLS data, the US civilian non-institutional population was 242,269 in January, an increase of 1.7 million month over month: apply the long-term average labor force participation rate of 65.8% to this number.. and you get 159.4 million: that is what the real labor force should be. The BLS reported one? 154.4 million: a tiny 5 million difference. Then add these people who the BLS is purposefully ignoring yet who most certainly are in dire need of labor and/or a job to the 12.758 million reported unemployed by the BLS and you get 17.776 million in real unemployed workers. What does this mean? That using just the BLS denominator in calculating the unemployed rate of 154.4 million, the real unemployment rate actually rose in January to 11.5%... " (ZeroHedge)
~ Labor Participation Rate chart- Older Americans are being forced to stay in the work force to survive the higher costs of everyday life and dwindling savings. The young to middle-aged are being either forced out of the labor market or simply denied entry.
Its very easy to play games of statistical distortion. In fact, let's play a simple one together just to make the point even clearer. In a room, are 100 people- 50 male & 50 women. And among this grouping are various races, ethnicities, etc... Now the question is: What percentage of these people have blonde hair?
Now on visual first sight, it appears 30 out of the 100 people have blonde hair- 30%. But we have to treat this exercise like those who compile the BLS reports so we have to now establish specific criteria as to what is 'blonde'. For instance if it decided that only natural blondes can call themselves that, we eliminate a percentage of those 30 'blondes'-- let's say 15 of them dye or color-treat their hair. So they don't count in the findings. Then its determined to be blonde, you must have blue eyes. So that eliminates another 5 people.
So now you can declare that out of 100 people, 10% are blondes (when its really 30% without all the games and manipulated criteria.)
In life, a person or entity can manipulate any statistic for their own agenda or psychological/ideological purpose. A person on a diet can say they cut their daily calorie intake by simply ignoring or distorting how many calories from sweets is ingested. Another can look at their bank account, see $2.5 million and feel quite wealthy and simply ignore the $3.1 million he/she owes to creditors. On and on..
The US Government is going to force you to feel hopeful and optimistic, and have you believe the nation is in recovery, if it has to figuratively choke you to death on pollyanna news, rising stock market Dow figures and other statistical distortion. And they have unlimited resources and tricks/schemes to do it...
Only the strong will survive this mind game
~ Look closely.. what do you see?
It was more because people really weren't.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics stated that non-farm payrolls went up by 243k in January, meaning in simple terms that 243,000 people were newly hired. Now, with rising population and those newly entering the work force taken into consideration, it takes a monthly creation of 225k jobs to lower unemployment... Mind you, this is over time, as in many years.
So how did the unemployment rate drop sooo dramatically??
1.2 million people dropped out of the labor force in one month!
Yes -- 1.2 million people.
"The labor force increased from 153.9 million to 154.4 million, the non institutional population increased by 242.3 million meaning, those not in the labor force surged from 86.7 million to 87.9 million. Which means that the civilian labor force tumbled to a fresh 30 year low of 63.7% as the BLS is seriously planning on eliminating nearly half of the available labor pool from the unemployment calculation... the US is replacing high paying FIRE jobs with low paying construction and manufacturing... " (ZeroHedge)
So what is the real uemployment rate in the US based on statistics from the BLS?
11.5% unemployed.
Its all about math (Warning- this gets a little technical):
"Using BLS data, the US civilian non-institutional population was 242,269 in January, an increase of 1.7 million month over month: apply the long-term average labor force participation rate of 65.8% to this number.. and you get 159.4 million: that is what the real labor force should be. The BLS reported one? 154.4 million: a tiny 5 million difference. Then add these people who the BLS is purposefully ignoring yet who most certainly are in dire need of labor and/or a job to the 12.758 million reported unemployed by the BLS and you get 17.776 million in real unemployed workers. What does this mean? That using just the BLS denominator in calculating the unemployed rate of 154.4 million, the real unemployment rate actually rose in January to 11.5%... " (ZeroHedge)
~ Labor Participation Rate chart- Older Americans are being forced to stay in the work force to survive the higher costs of everyday life and dwindling savings. The young to middle-aged are being either forced out of the labor market or simply denied entry.
Its very easy to play games of statistical distortion. In fact, let's play a simple one together just to make the point even clearer. In a room, are 100 people- 50 male & 50 women. And among this grouping are various races, ethnicities, etc... Now the question is: What percentage of these people have blonde hair?
Now on visual first sight, it appears 30 out of the 100 people have blonde hair- 30%. But we have to treat this exercise like those who compile the BLS reports so we have to now establish specific criteria as to what is 'blonde'. For instance if it decided that only natural blondes can call themselves that, we eliminate a percentage of those 30 'blondes'-- let's say 15 of them dye or color-treat their hair. So they don't count in the findings. Then its determined to be blonde, you must have blue eyes. So that eliminates another 5 people.
So now you can declare that out of 100 people, 10% are blondes (when its really 30% without all the games and manipulated criteria.)
In life, a person or entity can manipulate any statistic for their own agenda or psychological/ideological purpose. A person on a diet can say they cut their daily calorie intake by simply ignoring or distorting how many calories from sweets is ingested. Another can look at their bank account, see $2.5 million and feel quite wealthy and simply ignore the $3.1 million he/she owes to creditors. On and on..
The US Government is going to force you to feel hopeful and optimistic, and have you believe the nation is in recovery, if it has to figuratively choke you to death on pollyanna news, rising stock market Dow figures and other statistical distortion. And they have unlimited resources and tricks/schemes to do it...
Only the strong will survive this mind game
~ Look closely.. what do you see?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)